Vote for STAR!

Only STAR Party can protect and bring back the Truly concept of Independence and Sovereign Country!

Sarawak for Sarawakian!

The Spirit of Sarawak for Sarawakian is getting stronger everyday!

Is this Sabah and Sarawak fate?

Sabah and Sarawak were promised to have a Self-Government. But what happen after 50 years forming The Federation of Malaysia?

Sabah 50th Independence Day

Sabah or formerly known as North Borneo was granted an Independence by British on 31 August 1963

Sarawak 50th Independence Day

Sarawak was granted Independence by British on 22 July 1963

Friday, 1 November 2013

Meanwhile in MALAYA...



Sanggupkah kamu memekakkan telinga dan membutakan mata melihat isu ini sepanjang hayat kamu di Bumi SABAH ini ?

P/s: Perhatian dan makluman kepada semua warga sabah. Sesiapa yang belum mendaftar sebagai pengundi,sila mendaftar di pejabat pos yang berhampiran sebelum hujung bulan Disember 2012. proses pendaftaran mudah dan cepat hanya mengambil masa 5 minit sahaja. Jangan lupa membawa IC yang original.

Selamat mengundi. Bersama-sama kita tumbangkan kerajaan KORUPSI yang memberikan projek IC kepada PTI.



By, Rajah Raqafluz 

Baram dam protest - SARAWAK FOR SARAWAKIAN

Anyone can say ‘Allah’, not only Muslims - HARUNYAHYA


Adnan Oktar writes his books under the pen name of Harun Yahya.
He is a world-renowned man of ideas.
Previously in Malaysia, the use of the word “Allah” was prohibited for anyone other than Muslims as a result of a decision by a Malaysian court. The case was opened when the Catholic newspaper, The Herald, used the name Allah. 

This mistaken decision was based on illogical and theologically unacceptable reasoning: “Preventing any confusion that might be caused for Muslims when using the name Allah by the non-Muslims.” 

On the other hand, even though there were explanations the Malaysian government officials that this decision applied to The Herald newspaper only, it is obvious that in reality this decision will be applied to society in general and there will inevitably be an environment of severe oppression.

READ MORE: CLICK HERE
Website: Harunyahya

By, Rajah Raqafluz

Awakening political awareness - BORNEO FRONT (BARISAN BORNEO)


AWAKENING POLITICAL AWARENESS

Anti-Malaysia protests led by SUPP in 1962
But what was the response from the peoples of Sarawak to Tunku’s Malaysia scheme?

Post-war British governments were partial to the policy of disengagement from the colonies; if possible in an amicable and least traumatic manner. Against this background, the Tunku’s statement was received positively. 

In June 1961 Sir Alexander Waddell, Governor of Sarawak (1960-1963), and his counterpart in North Borneo, Sir William Goode (1960-1963), and D. C. White, High Commissioner for Brunei (1959-1963) were summoned for talks in Singapore with Lord Selkirk, Britain’s Commissioner General in South-East Asia (1959-1963).

Aware of the metropolitan government’s stance on de-colonization, the British Borneo leaders did not oppose Malaysia, but they did suggest a two-step process: Borneo Federation (North Borneo, Brunei and Sarawak) prior to entry to the Malaysia confederation. In spite of Brunei’s suspicions, serious consideration was given to the Borneo Federation, if necessary between North Borneo and Sarawak alone.


Local Sarawak leaders like Datu Bandar Abang Haji Mustapha and Temenggong Jugah anak Barieng were also partial to a Borneo Federation. Therefore the Tunku’s announcement took them by surprise. While others were in a state of bewilderment, Ong Kee Hui, Chairman of the Sarawak United People’s Party (SUPP) displayed forceful opposition towards Malaysia.

Ong, together with A.M. Azahari, leader of the Parti Rakyat Brunei (PRB), and Donald A. Stephens, later leader of the United National Kadazan Organisation (UNKO) formed a United Front to denounce Tunku’s proposal as “totally unacceptable to the people of the three territories”.

SUPP’s uncompromising stance received initial support from the Sarawak National Party (SNAP) led by Stephen Kalong Ningkan who maintained that, 

“Any attempt to put Sarawak under the influence and subjection of any foreign power would be strongly opposed.”


Credits: Borneo Wiki

By, Rajah Raqafluz

WHY MALAYSIA?



WHY MALAYSIA?

What motivated the federation’s first prime minister, Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj, to propose in 1961 that “it is inevitable that we should look ahead to this objective and think of a plan whereby these (five) territories can be brought closer together in political and economic co-operation’’?

The initiative apparently came from the wishes of Singapore’s leaders. David Marshall, Chief Minister of Singapore during the mid-1950s, was keen for a merger but the Tunku then was reluctant. Then in 1959, when Lee Kuan Yew of the People’s Action Party assumed the chief ministership, he too proposed a Malaya-Singapore merger for economic and political reasons. The Tunku’s initial reaction was at best lukewarm. As the political Left in Singapore gained momentum, however, the Tunku began to warm up to Lee’s persuasive arguments of merger.

Although the Tunku and his Malay colleagues in the United Malay National Organisation (Umno) did not want to have a Left-leaning Singapore as their neighbor, neither did they wish for a merger with Chinese-dominated Singapore that would mean upsetting the racial arithmetic in favor of the Chinese.

The Borneo territories then became imperative components in the wider federation scheme. Nearly 70% of the nearly 1.3 million inhabitants (1960 census) of North Borneo, Brunei and Sarawak comprised Malay-Muslims and non-Muslim indigenous peoples, the Borneo territories were viewed favorably as a counterweight to Singapore’s Chinese majority. The racial factor, however, was not then publicly emphasized.

This racial arithmetic, however, hinged on an assumption: “that in extreme racial issues the indigenous population of Borneo might choose to align themselves with the Malays (of Malaya), to whom they were racially akin, rather than to the Chinese”. But there was no guarantee that the Borneo indigenous would swing to the Malays in times of crisis.

Being politically less-sophisticated and naive, they could of course be manipulated and coerced or intimidated into aligning themselves with the Malayans.


Credits: Borneo Wiki

By, Rajah Raqafluz

PRESS ALERT: Filling of writ against Baram dam


INVITATION TO ATTEND MIRI HIGH COURT- 

2.30 P.M. FOR FILING OF WRIT AGAINST BARAM DAM

SHOW YOUR SUPPORT IF YOU ARE IN MIRI

WE MUST UNITE WITH SARAWAKIANS WHO ARE DEFENDING SARAWAK LAND!

Peter N.J. Kallang
Message from Peter N. J. Kallang.

Press Alert: A message sent by Harrison Ngau, the human right lawyer

A case against Baram Dam will be filled at the Miri High court at 2.30 pm on the 6th October 2013. All those who are against the construction of the Baram dam are invited. 


Please extend this invitation to friends and relatives.

Alert Akhbar: Satu kes saman akan di buat terhadap empangan Baram di Mekamah Tinggi, Miri pada 2.30 petang pada 6 hb Nov. 13. Tolong sampaikan jemputan ini kepada kawan dan sudara masing masing.





Credits: Borneo Wiki

By, Rajah Raqafluz

Alternative to Malaysia - BRUNEI PEOPLE'S PARTY


A parade for Brunei People's Party-c.1958

BPP had 99% Bruneian support and won all elective seats in August 1962 Legislative Assembly elections. 

BPP made 3 demands for independence as the alternative to Malaysia. But it was sidelined by the British, leading to the Dec 8 1962 anti-Malaysia Uprising. It is estimated every family has a member involved in the Uprising.

The Malaysia Agreement 1963 - WE MUST KNOW

THE MALAYSIA AGREEMENT

Paramount Chief of the Iban
Tun Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Temenggong Jugah anak Barieng

On July 9, 1963, Temenggong Jugah anak Barieng, Datu Bandar Abang Haji Mustapha, and Ling Beng Siew, as Sarawak’s representatives, penned their signature to the Malaysia Agreement in London.

Did they realize what they were signing and did they really represent Sarawak? Jugah in particular did not know how to read or write (according to a fairly authentic rumour he could sign his name by following a tattoo of it on the inside of his left forearm), Abang Mustapha was a representative of the Kuching Malays - seen by many Sarawakians as collaborators with the British colonial regime and Ling Beng Siew of the rich Sibu Foochow Chinese - who had nothing to lose and everything to gain.

The Federation of Malaysia was proclaimed on Sept 16 that year (1963) comprising the Federation of Malaya, Singapore, North Borneo, and Sarawak. The last three territories had been British Colonies until they gained their independence through participation in the wider Federation of Malaysia. 

Sarawak is poised to celebrate its 38th anniversary of independence on Sept 16, 1963. Sarawak’s entry into Malaysia was a momentous event and a turning point in its historical development. A century of paternalistic governance by an English dynasty of White Rajahs (or kings, from 1841 to 1941), three years and eight months under Imperial Japanese military rule (1941 to 1945), and 17 years as a British colony did little to prepare the multi-ethnic population of Sarawak to face the challenges posed by the concept of “Malaysia”.

From the start there was no real concept of "Malaysia", but a very real Malayan hegemonic control and interference over the states of Sarawak and Sabah. Singapore rebelled and was rewarded by being kicked out of the federation, which turned out to be a much better thing for it. Sarawak and Sabah opted to remain under Malayan dominance and were rewarded by the crumbs of their own resources - the main bulk of which fuelled the modern development of Malaya and the greed and power of the Malayan elites.

UMNO dealt at will with these two states - which each supposedly had equal status with the Malayan states (as a whole) - until ultimately UMNO established direct rule over Sabah by using foreign illegal immigrants who had been illegally given citizenship and thus outnumbered the local Sabahan natives.

They have not had to do this in Sarawak since Taib Mahmud and the Sarawak BN kept the local populace in check through a feudal mixture of divide and rule, threat, coercion and intimidation and plain money politics.

Nonetheless, through the farsightedness of Sarawak’s leaders, the decisive decision was taken during those critical months between the announcement of the formation of Malaysia in May 1961 and its declaration in September 1963.

Farsightedness? Far from it! They didn't really know what they were doing and were outfoxed by the cunning Malayans.


Credits: Borneo Wiki

By, Rajah Raqafluz

Does Sabah belong to KL? - DATUK DR. JEFFREY KITINGAN

Is the recent transfer of Sabah judges to the peninsular part of the federal government’s Malayanisation programme?

Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan is the Chairman of STAR Sabah and State Assemblymen for N33, Bingkor, Sabah.
He also contested in P180, Keningau garnering 11900 strong votes
KOTA KINABALU: The failure of Sabah Barisan Nasional government to assert its authority and stamp out attempts by the federal government to impose Malayan hegemony over the state and her citizens has raised a red flag in the state.

State assembly representative Jeffrey Kitingan said the sudden and unusual transfer of local judges and magistrates to the peninsula – and replaced by those from Peninsular Malaysia, and the silence of the state government on the matter is a cause for concern.

Describing it as highly unusual, Kitingan said the consequential replacements with Malayans raised questions over the motives of the federal leaders in their treatment of Sabahans and Sarawakians.

“Is this part of the federal government’s Malayanisation programme? Isn’t their replacements contradictory with the Borneonisation set out under the 20-Points and the Malaysia Agreement?,” he asked.

The Bingkor assemblyman said the issue of transfers, Borneonisation and rights of Bornean people of Sabahans and Sarawakians are important aspects of the special rights and privileges of the two states that were agreed to during the formation of Malaysia.

“Is there no government in Sabah to look after Sabahans? Has the Sabah government been consulted?

“Is the Sabah government aware of this? Has the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak been consulted?.

“It seems to me that the federal government no longer respects the special rights and privileges of Sabah and Sarawak,” he said, adding that the Sabah government must make an official stand on the matter.

Kitingan who never misses an opportunity to point out infringements of state autonomy guaranteed by the Malaysia Agreement, said the transfers raise questions about whether the authorities were ignoring the laws.

He reminded that at the outset of the formation of Malaysia it was agreed that there would be a High Court of Borneo (now known as the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak) and the appointment of judicial officers and commissioners would be under its jurisdiction.

No place for extremism

He pointed out that while the lower court officers come under the judicial and legal service commission, the federal government had ignored the fact that Sabah had its own set of local and customary laws and not just federal laws alone.

“The land laws take cognizance of local native customary rights and the local native customary laws are alien to Malayans, as if it is from another world compared to Sabah.

“In the dispensation of justice, Sabahans are entitled to and expect to be judged by qualified persons and knowledge of local laws and customs should a pre-requisite in Sabah,” he said.

The transfer of the local judges and magistrates has raised questions over Malay hegemony in Borneo since both the Director of the Courts and the Chief Registrar of Courts are from Malaya. Both these positions, he said, should be held by Borneo natives,

“Is the transfer an attempt to prevent a local native from being promoted? Is the move a pre-cursor to bringing in another Malay from the peninsula?” Kitingan asked.

“Whatever the motive or objective of the transfer and subsequent replacement exercise, the Sabah government and the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak need to look into the matter and assert their authority as Sabahans expect them to do.” he added.

Kitingan also drew an unflattering parallel between how Sarawak Chief Minister Taib Mahmud asserted Sarawak’s unique position as a partner in the formation of Malaysia and the silence of the Sabah Barisan Nasional government when hegemonic policies are thrust on the state.

“The Sabah government must do likewise and stop any attempt to impose Malayan Muslim hegemony in Sabah. There is no place in Sabah for such race and religion extremism,” he said.


Credits: FMT

By, Rajah Raqafluz

UNTOLD STORY - Sarawak riots 1962 & Anti-Malaysia Demonstration in Sarawak




Credit to Pandak Segata

By, Rajah Raqafluz
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...