Vote for STAR!
Only STAR Party can protect and bring back the Truly concept of Independence and Sovereign Country!
Sarawak for Sarawakian!
The Spirit of Sarawak for Sarawakian is getting stronger everyday!
Is this Sabah and Sarawak fate?
Sabah and Sarawak were promised to have a Self-Government. But what happen after 50 years forming The Federation of Malaysia?
Sabah 50th Independence Day
Sabah or formerly known as North Borneo was granted an Independence by British on 31 August 1963
Sarawak 50th Independence Day
Sarawak was granted Independence by British on 22 July 1963
Monday, 28 October 2013
Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan: Postpone GST for Sabah, Sarawak
 |
| Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan (STAR Sabah Chairman) |
KOTA KINABALU: Maverick Sabah politician Jeffrey Kitingan has slammed the 2014 Budget as a blow to the expectations of east Malaysians.
The state assembly representative said the people of Sabah and Sarawak had high hopes that the two states would be rewarded for keeping the Barisan Nasional government of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak in power.
But Kitingan said some amendments could still be made to the disappointing budget announced by Najib to give some relief to the long-suffering people of the two Borneo states.
One such measure, he said would be to postpone implementing the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in Sabah and Sarawak scheduled to come into effect nationwide in 2015.
“If the federal government can implement 1-country 2-laws on the “Allah” issue which indirectly is a recognition of the 1-Country 2-System, the federal government can exempt Sabah and Sarawak from the GST scheduled in 2015, at least for 3-5 years,” he said yesterday.
The Bingkor assemblyman also questioned the rationale of allocating funds to help reduce the prices of necessities in Sabah when the same could be accomplished by abolishing the cabotage policy.
The Budget 2014 allocation of RM331 million to continue the price uniformity program and subsidies including transport cost and RM30 million for an additional 60 Kedai Rakyat 1Malaysia (KR1M), he said, did not make economic sense.
He called it stop-gap measures which would not resolve the systemic problems of higher costs of living and high unemployment in Sabah.
“Both the federal and Sabah governments should undertake a study on the impact of the KRIM in Sabah as there are complaints that the KRIM has affected the small sundry and provision shops in Sabah and many will eventually close down,” he said.
Kitingan also agreed with other 2014 budget critics in the state that the allocation of RM2 to RM3 billion development expenditure for Sabah and Sarawak was a slap on the status of the equal partnership of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia.
Pittance for Borneo
He described the allocation of RM500 million for upgrading of the Pan Borneo Highway as a disgrace and totally unacceptable.
“For the record, RM400 million was announced for the 33km. Sibu-Kapit road. How far can RM500 million do for the Pan Borneo Highway?” he asked.
He reminded that just recently the state Public Works Department had revealed that RM2 billion was needed for urgent road repairs in Sabah and another RM700 million was needed to urgently repair and upgrade 65 bridges in Sabah.
“Yet there is not even a mention of any allocation in Budget 2014 (for this) … (this is) not the right way to treat Sabah which contributed 22 out of 25 MPs that help keep the Umno/BN federal government in power,” he said.
The budget planning for next year, he said, had come as “a huge disappointment to the people of Sabah” as well as senior state leaders like his elder brother Joseph Pairin, the president of BN coalition member Parti Bersatu Sabah.
“The PM himself had whipped up expectations of Sabahans especially the PBS delegates at their general assembly by asking Sabahans to wait for Friday’s Budget announcement,” he said.
On a national level, Kitingan said that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, who is also the Finance Minister, missed the opportunity to put the national economy on a stronger footing by reducing operating expenditure of RM217.7 billion.
In contrast, he said, only RM46.5 billion was set aside for development.
Reducing expenditure, he said, would have improved the country’s international credit rating and at the same time increase the well-being of the people especially the lower income groups.
Water tanks
Kitingan also lashed out at the cash handouts being made by the BN government, calling them approach as ill-conceived and leading to bigger expectations and greater dependency among the rural poor.
“There is no need to fish for votes for election season is over. The government should have invested more money in boosting the income earning capacity of the poor.
“Giving of RM75 million in water tanks is no way to treat the rural voters who voted to retain the Umno/BN federal government. If not for the 25 BN MPs in Sarawak, the budget would have been presented by a different Finance Minister,” he noted.
“It would have been better to spend RM500 million on 20 water treatment plants of RM25 million each to provide clean piped water in rural Sarawak given the many big dams there,” he said.
Kitingan also warned that the withdrawal of sugar subsidies would bring about an instantaneous price increase.
Taking a swipe at Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin on the reasoning behind the end to the subsidy, he said it was “laughable” and bordered on “absurdity” that the subsidy cut was paired with reducing the incidence of diabetes in Malaysians.
“It is an undisputed medical fact that diabetes is not caused by sugar alone and a lower sugar intake alone does not reduce the diabetic rate,” he said.
The budget for next year, he said, proved that the BN government was continuing to disregard the importance of Sabah and Sarawak.
“It is high time for the Sabah and Sarawak governments to re-assess their support of the Umno/BN federal government.
“Perhaps a withdrawal of support and change of the federal government may bring about a better 2015 Budget for Sabah and Sarawak and a shot in the arm for both local economies and a better outlook and way of life for Sabahans and Sarawakians,” he said
Credits: FMT
Silent history of Sarawak - BORNEONISATION VS MALAYANISATION
SILENT HISTORY OF SARAWAK
BORNEONISATION vs. MALAYANISATION
This article is reposted from "Pengayau's" web page with our humble thanks.
The Malayan government history of the Sarawak Malayan relationship has always been glossed over but it was at one stage near to totally break down when the Sarawak Government under C.M. Stephen Ningkan resisted "Malayanisation".
One of the so-called safeguards and agreement on the formation of Sarawak which involved conservative Sarawakians leaders at the final stages, was "Borneonisation". This was the agreement that Sarawakians were to take over the Sarawak civil service and all the positions.
Prof. Michael Leigh (pronounced "Lee") said in his book the "Rising Moon" that Malaya's objective was to centralize its rule which conflicted immediately with the federation ideas.
After the fond fare welling of the British colonial masters, the honeymoon between the new colonial master and the new subject ended quickly.
The Malayan government fell to the serious business of re-writing all the agreements with its attempts to centralize Malayan rule and inevitable tension and resistance from the "new states".
The first casualty was Singapore separation which effectively tore up the Malaysia Agreement.
The "Sarawak Crisis" erupted at around the same time.
This article gives some details of the 1965-1966 Malayan hatched "constitutional crisis" to oust Ningkan following the breakup with Singapore and the process of neutralizing and absorbing the opposition like the SUPP led by moderate leaders after the British had suppressed the left wing section of the party.
Vernon Porrit's article contained a few factual errors.
For example some of the dates are not accurate such as Sarawak independence should be from 1841-1941 not 1946 when it was ceded to Britain.
It was under Japanese occupation from 24 Dec. 1941 to Aug. 1945. He also confused the names and identity of some people he mentioned.
"Expatriate" influence continued till 1968 and even later in the defense area. Tim Hardy was still head of Special Branch till 1968. So the Britain was still directing the "show" to some extent especially in securing Sarawak and Sabah "safe" for Malayan rule.
This proved that despite their claims, Malaya was not capable of defending either country in "Malaysia" its first 10 years without British armed might. It was virtually financially broke until Sabah Sarawak oil dollars started to flow to Kuala Lumpur bank accounts.
 |
| C.M. Stephen Ningkan was a part Iban-Chinese (Hakka). |
LATEST: Group of Sarawakian wants to sue British government over Sarawak sovereignty - LINA SOO
From: Mangan Ngandok
To: Lina Soo
I received these two (email) in my mail today and thought it was my divine duty to spread the words around. Please read and understand the contents.
Subject: Re: Court action/ donation to legal costs
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 04:13:50 -0400
Hi friends,
1. First step is to go for judgement most like, International Court of Justice (ICJ) as British courts may be bias, to declare Malaysia illegally formed. Therefore Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not binding.
2. Also declaration that Sarawak and Sabah retain independence as of 22 July and 31 August 1963.
3. Get UN recognition of legal position- If UN tells Malaya to get out - it has no ground to remain- it will be seen as "Occupation".
4. Malaya withdraws - no issue of referendum unless some people are still conned and want to stay.
5. Check East Timor Case. Indonesia had to accept East Timor referendum results for independence. Also Eritrea and S. Sudan- all former colonial governments had to accept the "Yes" to independence vote and withdraw from these countries.
6. Before we can get off the ground- need to seek QC Opinion and that will cause a fortune.
So if any of you feel stronger that Sarawak and Sabah should no longer be part of Malaysia- needed to contribute to the effort. If you are unable to write or support in other ways, donate some money - for your country.
We won't need to go into "patriotism" and all that. If you want your future generation to have a future.. This is the best course of action.
It is not much... A couple of hundred or thousands of some of us. HZ said he will donate $30K rm. Another pensioner said he will donate 1/2 his monthly pension.
They probably waited 50 years for this. Not to mention in the 1960s many people in our age group actually took up arms to fight Malaysia.
We were misled into believing formation of Malaysia was free and voluntary, please read these two docs are part of the evidence of the colonial plan from the declassified colonial documents.
From Admin: This is extract from Mangan's posting today, minus the second part.
For readers' comments pleasa.
Thank you.
CLICK FOR MORE DETAIL:
Group wants to sue British government over Sarawak sovereignty
To order, bank-in at Maybank account no. 511252003021 (Lina Soo), pm or sms (013-816429) payment details with address (no post box pleases)
To: Lina Soo
I received these two (email) in my mail today and thought it was my divine duty to spread the words around. Please read and understand the contents.
Subject: Re: Court action/ donation to legal costs
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 04:13:50 -0400
Hi friends,
1. First step is to go for judgement most like, International Court of Justice (ICJ) as British courts may be bias, to declare Malaysia illegally formed. Therefore Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not binding.
2. Also declaration that Sarawak and Sabah retain independence as of 22 July and 31 August 1963.
3. Get UN recognition of legal position- If UN tells Malaya to get out - it has no ground to remain- it will be seen as "Occupation".
4. Malaya withdraws - no issue of referendum unless some people are still conned and want to stay.
5. Check East Timor Case. Indonesia had to accept East Timor referendum results for independence. Also Eritrea and S. Sudan- all former colonial governments had to accept the "Yes" to independence vote and withdraw from these countries.
6. Before we can get off the ground- need to seek QC Opinion and that will cause a fortune.
So if any of you feel stronger that Sarawak and Sabah should no longer be part of Malaysia- needed to contribute to the effort. If you are unable to write or support in other ways, donate some money - for your country.
We won't need to go into "patriotism" and all that. If you want your future generation to have a future.. This is the best course of action.
It is not much... A couple of hundred or thousands of some of us. HZ said he will donate $30K rm. Another pensioner said he will donate 1/2 his monthly pension.
They probably waited 50 years for this. Not to mention in the 1960s many people in our age group actually took up arms to fight Malaysia.
We were misled into believing formation of Malaysia was free and voluntary, please read these two docs are part of the evidence of the colonial plan from the declassified colonial documents.
From Admin: This is extract from Mangan's posting today, minus the second part.
For readers' comments pleasa.
Thank you.
CLICK FOR MORE DETAIL:
Group wants to sue British government over Sarawak sovereignty
 |
| Lina Soo is a candidate for State Reform Party (STAR) for P196 Stampin, Sarawak in GE-13 Author of the popular book, SARAWAK: The Real Deal. |
“The British government had deprived the people of Sarawak the right to self determination, which resulted in the consequent loss of its resources and wealth running into hundreds of trillions, loss of identity and territorial integrity.
“We were handed to Malaya when we were not ready. We want to seek a declaration from the British court as we had been denied the right to self determination. We had to be given this right to decide whether we wanted to federate with any countries. This is a proper process.”
 |
| SARAWAK: The Real Deal. |
Book: SARAWAK: The Real Deal
Now selling online at RM90 per copy inclusive of express post delivery and handling.
Print is limited and not available in bookshops.
To order, bank-in at Maybank account no. 511252003021 (Lina Soo), pm or sms (013-816429) payment details with address (no post box pleases)
Facebook: Lina Soo
Melayu Raya? - LINA SOO
MELAYU RAYA
 |
| Melayu Raya? |
This morning I have received a note from a political analyst:
Taib will have to step down in mid-2014 in an attempt to woo the Chinese back to BN during the state polls expected in 2016. Jabu is likely to take over as CM.
Think. Once Taib falls, Bintulu will fall. Sarawak will fall. Befallen like Sabah what is today.
Since the 1980s, Mahathir had wanted Sarawak to cede Bintulu to become Federal Territory like Labuan Wilayah.
It is also estimated that there are about 400,000 immigrant workers in Sarawak, many from Indonesia and Pakistan, legal and illegal. Once Sarawak immigration autonomy is undermined, many of these will be given ICs. Sarawak will be a just Sabah clone.
Once Sarawak and Sabah are fully controlled and subjugated by Federal Government with cession of our choicest lands (oil, gas, gold, minerals) and population re-engineering, the Plan is complete.
MELAYU RAYA comprising Malaya, Sarawak, Sabah, and Muslim southern Philippines. The Malaynization of the region.
What it was intended from the beginning.
 |
| Lina Soo is a candidate for State Reform Party (STAR) for P196 Stampin, Sarawak in GE-13 |
Undoubtedly. No need to woo the Chinese who don't want to be wooed. Let the Chinese make the choice either to stay in opposition or not, this is democracy at work.
Sarawak must stay united
Facebook: Lina Soo
MALAYAN COLONIZATION ISSUES - REPORT ON STRONG SEPARATIST ISSUES IN SABAH SARAWAK
MALAYAN COLONIZATION ISSUES
REPORT ON STRONG SEPARATIST ISSUES IN SABAH SARAWAK
Hardly three years after the World Bank used Malaysian government figures to underline in Kota Kinabalu in Dec 2010 that Sabah and Sarawak were the poorest states in Malaysia, “I am Malay First” Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin turned up in the Sabah capital on Mon 30 Sept and declared that “Malaysia has been a blessing – in disguise? -- to the Bumiputera”. No mention of the so-called non-Bumiputera.
The last time that anyone checked the figures, these two nations in Borneo were still the poorest in Malaysia. If something is a “blessing” in disguise, then one is merely indulging in wishful thinking to console oneself on a negative situation and living on hope.
FULL STORY: CLICK HERE
By, Rajah Raqafluz
Bajet 2014: Manifesto rumah MAMPUS milik BN - HENDRY MINAR
Manifesto rumah MAMPUS milik BN.
Harga rumah RM400K
Mampus gila mahal. Ini ka level mampu milik? Apa sudah gila ker pegawai2 kerajaan Najib?
Interest rate untuk pinjaman 25 tahun ialah 5.99% .
Kalau pinjam ▶ byr bulanan
RM400K ▶ RM2575
RM350K ▶ RM2253
RM300K ▶ RM1931
RM250K ▶ RM1609
RM200K ▶ RM1287
RM150K ▶ RM966
RM100K ▶ RM644
Gaji minima RM900!!!! (Malaya)
Gaji minima RM800!!!! (Sarawak/Sabah)
Boleh fikir bagaimana yang gaji RM3500 sebulan nak beli rumah tak? Anak..isteri..kereta..rumah..h
 |
| Hendry Minar is a candidate for State Reform Party (STAR) for DUN Keranaan, Ranau, Sabah in GE-13 |
Facebook: Hendry Minar
By, Rajah Raqafluz
Features of Colonialism...LESSON FOR SABAH/SARAWAK.
HISTORY OF SLAVE TRADE- 1492-1900
A SORRY HISTORY THAT SHIPPED UP TO 60 MILLION AFRICANS INTO SLAVERY
Portuguese traders built sub-Saharan Africa's first permanent slave trading post at Elmina in 1492.
It passed into Dutch and English hands and by the 18th century they shipped tens of thousands of Africans a year through 'the door of no return' onto squalid slave ships bound for the plantations of the Americas.
European traders would sail to the west coast of Africa with manufactured goods which they exchanged for people captured by African traders.
The European merchants would then cross the Atlantic with ships full of slaves on the notorious 'Middle Passage'.
Conditions were so torrid that many of the captors, who often had barely any space to move, did not survive the journey.
Those who made the voyage were destined to work on plantations that produced products such as sugar or tobacco for consumption back in Europe.
(Does this sound familiar as Sabah and Sarawak is full of plantation such as oil palm, rubber, pepper, etc. and then, all the taxes, and the products will be sold and transfer "SOMEWHERE" out of Sarawak and Sabah, for "THEIR" benefits in term of money and development fund?)
